Techniques For Alleviating Dental Anxiety, Fear, And Phobias

This white paper focuses on techniques for alleviating dental anxiety, fear, and phobias through the use of positive interior support design and environmental distractions. Reports of Dental Anxiety in up to 74% of children and adolescents imply that anxiety is a major concern in dental offices. Pediatric dental theming vastly improved patient experience by relieving anxiety, fear, and phobias from a young age. It is also possible to have a significant positive impact on the duration of a patient’s life, as well as future generations by halting the cycle of dental avoidance through office theming. This white paper also highlights several support design products and delves into the reasons why theming in medical environments is so crucial to patient wellbeing. Anxiety, by definition, is a ‘state of apprehension resulting from the anticipation of a threatening event or situation’ (American Heritage Science Dictionary). Anxiety is differentiated from fear, as fear occurs in the presence of an observed threat, while Anxiety requires no such tangible manifestation. Anxiety may develop into a phobia; which is defined as an extreme or irrational fear or aversion, which may result in avoidance or endurance that results in significant discomfort to the individual. Dental fear, anxiety and phobias negatively effect patient care and develop from an early age. A cross-sectional study of 100 patients from the Pediatric Dentistry Clinic of the Federal University of Parana foundShow MoreRelatedDeveloping Management Skills404131 Words   |  1617 PagesThrough Work Redesign 130 Eliminating Anticipatory Stressors Through Prioritizing, Goal Setting, and Small Wins 132 Developing Resiliency 134 Physiological Resiliency 136 Psychological Resiliency 139 Social Resiliency 143 Temporary Stress-Reduction Techniques 144 SKILL ANALYSIS 147 Cases Involving Stress Management 147 The Turn of the Tide 147 The Case of the Missing Time 150 SKILL PRACTICE 155 Exercises for Long-Term and Short-Run Stress Management The Small-Wins Strategy 155 Life-Balance Analysis 156

Why Did Men Continue to Fight in Ww1 Free Essays

Why did men continue to fight in WWI? The Great War was fought between 1914 until 1918. It took the lives of millions of men and it is said to have had horrible conditions, the question still remains. Why did men continue to fight in the Great War? Was it because of their discipline in the army? Did they fight because of their friends in the army? Or were the conditions in the trenches not as bad as people say they were? This essay will argue that, even though all of these reasons were very important, the main reason men continued to fight was army discipline and comradeship. We will write a custom essay sample on Why Did Men Continue to Fight in Ww1? or any similar topic only for you Order Now Army discipline was definitely an important factor for why men continued to fight. The army aimed to keep soldiers as disciplined as possible, therefore they made severe punishments for misbehaviour. For example, if soldiers refused to walk through â€Å"no mans land† the punishment would be to be shot by a firing squad, the firing squad would be your own battalion. This would be done to increase the discipline of the rest of the battalion. They knew that if they were to disobey orders their friends and comrades would shoot them. However, around five million men served in the British army during the war; out of all these men, 3080 men were sentenced to death but only 364 were actually executed. This evidence suggests that perhaps army discipline was not the most important factor, however, 364 men might have scared most men enough to not disobey orders. The conditions of the trenches were said to be horrific and devastating, however the British army had very high standards of cleanliness and they were aware of what the soldiers needed to keep on fighting. They aimed to keep morale as high as possible and therefore provided more than sufficient amount of food, very good medical care, and tried to generally make the soldiers’ living conditions better. Efforts were made to keep the trenches cleaner; for example, rats were a big issue at the beginning of the war but as the war progressed, they were quickly eliminated from the trenches. Lice were also a problem so they fumigated, washed and ironed soldiers’ uniforms when they came out of the line. Since soldiers got taken care of, this was definitely one of the reasons they continued to fight, or at least made ighting more bearable. The men who fought in the war would often make friends in their battalions. This would definitely keep the men strong and able to fight. The soldiers did not want to let their friends down, and they all wanted to fight for their fellow soldiers. None of them wanted to die, but it was worst to die alone without their friends. They fought to keep th eir friends and themselves alive, so they could bear the war in the company of people they cared for. Sometimes, soldiers became such good friends, they went mad if their friend died, or they would continue to see each other after the war. Comradeship was a very important factor that helped them get through the war. You cannot generalize why men continued to fight. Different men fought for different things. But most men probably fought for various reasons. The fact that the conditions were not so bad probably helped men a lot, as well as being able to fight with their friends. But the fear of death by the hand of their friends was probably what drove most people to keep on fighting in the war. It probably also helped other soldiers encourage their friends to keep on fighting, and therefore army discipline and comradeship are the most important causes. How to cite Why Did Men Continue to Fight in Ww1?, Essay examples

Factors on Resource Competitive Strategies †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Factors on Resource Competitive Strategies. Answer: Introduction: Strategic development is the process in which, managers find long term directions of their organisation, set specific standards for their performance, formulate strategies to attain these objectives and execute the selected action plans with managing all external and internal circumstances. By setting targets, management finds easy to review their accomplishments. By analysing the current market situation, businesses can ultimately avoid the errors other organisations made and reconsider their strategy without any difficulty. Development of business strategies enables the managers to know about the competitive advantages and risks, which is helpful to operate business successfully. Strategic development contributes to the corporate strategy of the company, which directly controls leadership style of the companys management. This essay explains the various tools for effective strategic development within the organisation(Wirtz, et al., 2010). There are various tools for analysing internal and external environmental factors which helps developing strategy of the firm. Some of the main tools includes, PESTEL analysis, Porters Five Forces Model and SWOT analyses. PESTEL analysis: PESTEL analysis is a reliable and majorly used tool for evaluating strategic risk factors. The process of analysing firms external environment includes five stages: finding PEST issues, identifying its effects on the organisation, classifying into threats and opportunities, arranging factors on the basis of priority and taking corrective strategic actions(Song, et al., 2017). Example: Tesco is a multinational company having headquarter in United Kingdom with its stores in 12 countries. Tesco has diversified its operations in mobile, finance, hardware services, insurance and many other sectors. Study of its risk factors through PESTLE analysis will provide more information about the strategy of the firm. Political factors: These contain taxation system, stability of the market and acts of regulations of the country in which it operates. Government of many countries inspire retailers to introduce jobs for the local population because of constant financial stability. For this purpose, Tesco is creating job opportunities and diversifying its functions and products. It is resulting in increase in demand for the products and services of TESCO. Economic factors: Since economic factors are most likely to demand, leverage cost, prices and profits, company should be alert of even small changes in guidelines which may affect the accountability of finance. It is a considerable factor that, while rising internationally, UK market alone holds around 30% of the total market share of TESCO. The major reasons of its success are its two key strategies: Diversification and internationalization. Social factors: A number of social changes shifted the customers towards one stop shopping and bulk purchasing. As an impact of this, TESCO has also enlarged the amount of non-food products. The products and services claimed by the customers are influenced by their social beliefs. Food demands of the customers are continuously changing because they are considering the health issues. Tesco is constantly adopting these changes by providing organic products to consumers. Technological factors: These includes introduction and development of online shopping, facility of home delivery, and introduction of self-service points. Tesco has financed a significant amount in these areas to fulfil long term goals and operate the business functions successfully. Environmental factors: Government of many countries is increasing pressure on the organisations to pay attention towards environmental issues and to implement ways of production that are beneficial for the society. Tesco is committed to dropping its carbon footprint by 50% till 2020. Tesco is also minimizing the amount of waste production in stores by enhancing social awareness in customers. Legal factors: Government legislations and policies directly affect the performance of Tesco. For example: according to the suggestion of Food Retailing Commission, all organisations should introduce a code of practice which may result in banning current practices like changes in price without prior notice or demand for the payment form suppliers. To enable these changes, Tesco offers its consumers price deductions on the fuel purchased by them in accordance with the expenses made by them on grocery stores(Srdjevic, et al., 2012). SWOT analyses: This is a business analysing technique that an organisation can perform for its services, products, and markets while deciding the best possible way to attain growth and success. The process of SWOT analyses involves identifying the weaknesses and strength of the firm, and threats and opportunities exist in the market where it operates(Ayotunde Cheshmehzangi, 2017). Example: This example contains the SWOT analyses of Audi, a well-known international four wheeler manufacturer. Each categories of SWOT includes a list of main facts, which helps in explanation of each category. Strengths: Audi is the second largest car manufacturing corporation in the world function in more than 153 countries. The track record displays high growth in international and domestic sales. Audi has high return on assets and return on equity in comparison to its rivals. Weaknesses: Its market share less in terms of revenue, as compared to other large companies such as BMW, Ford and Daimler. There is an increase in product recall in recent years that shows bad control over product quality. High product recall also results in decreasing consumers faith in brand which may result in decrease in sales(Fujii, 2013). Opportunities: Audi has emphasized on introducing hybrid electric vehicles which may result in increase in demand. Increasing energy expenses and increase in production regulations may become the reason for increase in demand for HEV. Global legislations and environmental factors, and need to consult global resources are chief motivator for consumers in determining acceptability of HEVs(Sarsby, 2016). Threats: Recessions in US, Europe and other main markets have caused in sharp decrease in demand. Audi earns 70% of its total revenue from US and Europe. Car production companies have to bear high amount of fixed labour cost. Manufacturers capacity to reduce fixed cost is generally limited. Sales assistances of leasing functions affects Audis capability to continue its profitability and maintain its share in the market(Grath Bates, 2017). Porters Five Forces Analyses: Michael Porters five forces model measures competitiveness of the industry in which a firm operates. The five forces covers all aspect that are important to analyse the competitive factors that affect the strategic development of the firm Threat of new entrants: Capital requirement for enter into beverage industry is low and barriers to enter into market are almost none. A number of new brands are appearing in the industry with same prices and products. On the other hand, Coca-Cola have substantial market segment from a long time and good customers does not accept a new brand so quickly (Martin, 2014). Threat of Substitutes: There are a number of soft drinks available in the industry having almost same taste and flavour to Coca-Cola. Even sometimes it is not possible to find out the difference between Pepsi and Coca-Cola(Wilkinson, 2013). Bargaining power of buyers: Individual buyer is not able to pressurise profitability of Coca-Cola. But large buyers like Wal-Mart, can affect the business of the company because they make purchases in bulk quantity(D'aveni, et al., 2010). Bargaining power of suppliers: Coca- Cola generally make purchases in large amount from its suppliers and suppliers are also not differentiated or concentrated. It reflects the fact that bargaining power of suppliers is not so high that impacts the strategic development of Coca-Cola. Rivalry: The main rival of Coca-Cola is, Pepsi which also offers a range of soft drinks. Both Pepsi and Coca-Cola are leading beverages and heavily used in outdoor activities and events. There are other many brands with different flavours but none of those brands are able to reach the level of Pepsi and Coke(Tavitiyaman, et al., 2011). In order to introduce strategic development, a company can used any of the above mentioned tools or all of the tools to know about the external and internal environmental factors that affect the strength, weaknesses, threats and opportunities of the firm. The study concludes that after analysing all the factors, their effects and corrective action, it is easy to develop a strategy for effective functioning of the firm and to achieve competitiveness and growth(Nelke, 2011). References Ayotunde, D. Cheshmehzangi, A., 2017. Passive Cooling Energy Systems SWOT Analyses for Energy-use Reductions at Three Spatial Levels. Energy Procedia, Volume 105, pp. 3411-3418. D'aveni, R. A., Dagnino, G. B. Smith, K. G., 2010. The Age Of Temproary Advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(13), pp. 1371-1385. Fujii, T., 2013. Global Competitive Advantage Skill of Balanced Scorecard By SWOT Analysis and Strategic Map: BSC Project Management Essentials by Many Case Study of SWOT Analysis?and Strategic Map. Tennessee: Tom Publishing. Grath, J. M. Bates, B., 2017. The Little Book of Big Management Theories: ... and how to use them. 2nd ed. London: Pearson. Martin, 2014. Threat Of New Entrants | Porters Five Forces Model. [Online] Available at: https://www.cleverism.com/threat-of-new-entrants-porters-five-forces-model/ [Accessed 15 April 2018]. Nelke, M., 2011. Strategic Business Development for Information Centres and Libraries. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Sarsby, A., 2016. SWOT Analysis. s.l.:Lulu.com. Song, J., Sun, Y. Jin, L., 2017. PESTEL analysis of the development of the waste-to-energy incineration industry in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Volume 80, pp. 276-289. Srdjevic, Z., Bajcetic, R. Srdjevic, B., 2012. Identifying the Criteria Set for Multicriteria Decision Making Based on SWOT/PESTLE Analysis: A Case Study of Reconstructing A Water Intake Structure. Water Resource Management, 26(12), pp. 3379-3393. Tavitiyaman, P., Qu, H. Zhang, H. Q., 2011. The impact of industry force factors on resource competitive strategies and hotel performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(3), pp. 648-657. Wilkinson, J., 2013. Threat of Substitutes (one of Porters Five Forces). [Online] Available at: https://strategiccfo.com/threat-of-substitutes-one-of-porters-five-forces/ [Accessed 15 April 2018]. Wirtz, B. W., Schilke, O. Ullrich, S., 2010. StrategicDevelopment of Business Models: Implications of the Web 2.0 for Creating Value on the Internet. Long Range Planning, 43(2), pp. 272-290.